UK Annual Preterm Birth virtual conference 2021
Schedule
Keynote Speakers
Poster Presentations
Oral Presentations
Menu
Schedule
Keynote Speakers
Poster Presentations
Oral Presentations
Conference Evaluation
What was your overall impression of the virtual conference?
Very Poor
Poor
Fair
Good
Very Good
Did the virtual conference meet your expectations?
No
Partly
Yes
Why / Why Not?
What did you like in particular? What did you find most useful?
What could be done differently? Please share any suggestions for improvement
Would a mixture of virtual and face to face conference be good in the future?
No
Partly
Yes
Why/why not?
Conference content
Was the....
Media use (slides etc.)
Too Little
About Right
Too Much
Mix of plenaries, oral sessions and poster sessions
Not Balanced
Partly Balanced
Well Balanced
Amount of interaction/activities
Not Balanced
Partly Balanced
Well Balanced
Conference pace
Too Slow
About Right
Too Slow
Conference duration
Too Short
About Right
Too Long
Academic level
Too Low
About Right
Too High
Plenary Speakers
How would you rate the plenary sessions on a scale from 1 (very poor) to 5 (very good) in terms of:
Lecture Content
1 (Very Poor)
2
3
4
5 (Very Good)
Lecture presentation/delivery
1 (Very Poor)
2
3
4
5 (Very Good)
Dealing with questions
1 (Very Poor)
2
3
4
5 (Very Good)
Conference Oral Plenary Presentations
Overall, how would you rate the oral sessions you attended on a scale from 1 (very poor) to 5 (very good) in terms of the presenters’:
Lecture Content
1 (Very Poor)
2
3
4
5 (Very Good)
Lecture presentation/delivery
1 (Very Poor)
2
3
4
5 (Very Good)
Dealing with questions
1 (Very Poor)
2
3
4
5 (Very Good)
Conference Concurrent Oral Presentations
Overall, how would you rate the Cerclage simulation session you attended on a scale from 1 (very poor) to 5 (very good) in terms of the presenters’:
Lecture Content
1 (Very Poor)
2
3
4
5 (Very Good)
Dealing with questions
1 (Very Poor)
2
3
4
5 (Very Good)
Lecture presentation/delivery
1 (Very Poor)
2
3
4
5 (Very Good)
Debate Session
Overall, how would you rate the Debate Session you attended on a scale from 1 (very poor) to 5 (very good) in terms of the presenters’:
Lecture Content
1 (Very Poor)
2
3
4
5 (Very Good)
Dealing with questions
1 (Very Poor)
2
3
4
5 (Very Good)
Lecture presentation/delivery
1 (Very Poor)
2
3
4
5 (Very Good)
Poster Sessions
How would you rate the posters presented at the conference on a scale from 1 (very poor) to 5 (very good) in terms of:
Poster Content
1 (Very Poor)
2
3
4
5 (Very Good)
Poster Visual Presentation
1 (Very Poor)
2
3
4
5 (Very Good)
Poster Oral Presentation
1 (Very Poor)
2
3
4
5 (Very Good)
Conference Delivery and Support
Conference facility and delivery
1 (Very Poor)
2
3
4
5 (Very Good)
Pre-conference support & organisation
1 (Very Poor)
2
3
4
5 (Very Good)
Support during the conference
1 (Very Poor)
2
3
4
5 (Very Good)
If you would like to be part of the UK Preterm clinical network mailing list, please supply your email here:
Any other comments about the event: