IMplementation of the Preterm Birth Surveillance PAthway: a RealisT evaluation (The IMPART Study)
Authors
Presented by
Naomi Carlisle
Affiliations
Introduction
In the UK, 7.6% of babies are born preterm, which the Department of Health aims to decrease to 6% by 2025. To advance this, NHS England released Saving Babies Lives Care Bundle Version 2 Element 5, recommending the Preterm Birth Pathway for women at risk of preterm birth. The success of this new pathway depends on its implementation. The IMPART study aimed to research how, why, for whom, to what extent and in what contexts the prediction and prevention aspects of Preterm Birth Surveillance Pathway is implemented.
Methods
A realist evaluation was undertaken. Initial programme theories were developed through a realist informed literature scope, interviews with developers of the NHS England guidance, and a national questionnaire of current practice (Carlisle et al., 2023). Data (interviews and observations with staff and women) were undertaken in 3 case sites in England to ‘test’ the programme theories.
Results
Three explanatory areas were developed: risk assessing and referral; the preterm birth surveillance clinic; and women centred care.
Explanatory area 1 highlighted how risk assessment and referral could be undertaken incorrectly due to a lack of knowledge of preterm birth risk factors, a lack of knowledge on the purpose of the pathway or because practical difficulties prevent easy and appropriate referral.
Explanatory area 2 focused on how once a correct referral has been made to a preterm clinic, knowledgeable and supported clinicians can deliver a well-functioning clinic. If there is a core group of multidisciplinary preterm specialists, they can develop concentrated knowledge and expertise. Nuanced and individualised care could be missing if transvaginal cervical length scans were not undertaken by the specialist preterm team. If sites work together with their local network, resources and support provided can reduce variations of care.
Explanatory area 3 concentrated on how the pathway delivers appropriate care to women. A multidisciplinary preterm team can provide individualised continuity of care, where clinicians are aware and attentive of a woman’s history, yet ensuring ordinary aspects of their pregnancy are not overshadowed.
Conclusion
The IMPART study provides several areas where implementation could be improved. These include educating clinicians on risk factors and the purpose of the preterm clinic, having a specialist multidisciplinary team, and sites actively working with their local network. This multidisciplinary preterm team are then placed to deliver continuity of care for women at high-risk of preterm birth, being attentive to their history but also ensuring they are not defined by their risk status.