A Novel Technique for Cervical Cerclage Placement at Laparoscopic Pre-Pregnancy Abdominal Cerclage: Operative outcomes and Impact on Preterm Birth
Authors
Presenter
Gillian Corbett
Affiliations
1. UCD Perinatal Research Centre, UCD School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
2. National Maternity Hospital, Dublin 2 Ireland
3. University College Dublin, Ireland
Abstract
Background
Abdominal cerclage is an important and efficacious option for women at significant risk of preterm birth. Laparoscopic pre-pregnancy cerclage is associated with lowest peri-operative risk and optimal pregnancy outcomes. Traditional technique for placing cerclage includes bladder reflection and dissection lateral to the lower uterine body to create bilateral peritoneal windows. Novel use of the port closure device to pass suture material has been used in our unit in recent years. Given paucity of data on outcomes for this novel technique, we report both operative and subsequent pregnancy outcomes for port closure device technique compared to traditional dissection technique for cerclage placement at laparoscopic pre-pregnancy abdominal cerclage.
Method
This is a retrospective cohort study at the National Maternity Hospital over the last ten years (2012-2022). All cases of abdominal cerclage were identified using hospital electronic coding system and variables were collected from electronic health records and patient charts. Operative and pregnancy outcomes were compared between surgical techniques. Ethical approval was granted by the National Maternity Hospital.
Results
Over the study period, sixty-two total abdominal cerclages were identified with seventy subsequent pregnancies. These included fifty pre-pregnancy laparoscopic cerclages, forty-eight of which had operative notes available. Traditional technique was used in thirty-three cases and Port Closure Device technique was used in fifteen. Peri-operative factors across groups were similar regarding maternal age, weight at surgery, number of previous abdominal surgeries, entry technique, suture material and rates of bladder reflection. Compared to traditional approach, the port closure device technique was associated with lower blood loss (0.0+-0.0ml vs 12.9+-34.1ml, p=0.003) and shorter hospital length of stay (0.1+-0.4 vs 0.8+-0.8 days, p=0.032). There were trends in shorter operating time (43.1+-15.1 vs 50.7+-18.2 minutes, p=0.513) and less required laparoscopic ports (2.9+0.6- vs 3.5+-0.7 ports, p=0.133), not achieve statistically significance. All six cases of laparoscopic peri-operative complications occurred with the traditional technique (18.2% vs 0.0%, p=0.077). These one uterine perforation, and issues with bladder dissection and creation of peritoneal window including conversion to open, unsuccessful dissection requiring re-operation and post operative urinary retention.
The subsequent livebirth and miscarriage rates were similar between techniques. Interestingly, all cases of preterm birth occurred in the traditional technique group (20.8% vs 0.0%, p=0.278), although this was not statistically significant in these small sub-cohorts. All cases of antenatal admission with TPTL occurred in the traditional technique group (40.0% vs 0.0%, p=0.016), but was not significant in this small sub-cohort.
Conclusion
The novel technique of using port closure device for suture placement at laparoscopic abdominal cerclage is associated with lower blood loss and length of stay and similar livebirth and miscarriage rates. There were also trends in shorter operating times, less laparoscopic port requirement and lower rate of preterm birth.